AMD Radeon R2 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
  • Around 24% better floating-point performance: 179.2 gflops vs 144 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 58 Watt
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 245 vs 215
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 68 vs 45
  • Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7324 vs 5892
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1912 vs 1686
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1912 vs 1686
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 February 2015 vs 26 January 2010
Pipelines 128 vs 48
Floating-point performance 179.2 gflops vs 144 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 58 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 245 vs 215
PassMark - G2D Mark 68 vs 45
Geekbench - OpenCL 7324 vs 5892
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1912 vs 1686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1912 vs 1686

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

  • Around 94% higher core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 700 MHz
  • 2.6x more texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
Core clock speed 1360 MHz vs 700 MHz
Texture fill rate 14.4 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
245
215
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
68
45
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7324
5892
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1912
1686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1912
1686
Name AMD Radeon R2 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
PassMark - G3D Mark 245 215
PassMark - G2D Mark 68 45
Geekbench - OpenCL 7324 5892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 93.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.263
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 6.299
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 16.121
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1912 1686
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 375
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1282
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1912 1686

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R2 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Tesla
Code name Beema G94
Launch date 27 February 2015 26 January 2010
Place in performance rating 1587 1584
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $79.99
Price now $79.99
Value for money (0-100) 5.72

Technical info

Core clock speed 700 MHz 1360 MHz
Floating-point performance 179.2 gflops 144 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 128 48
Texture fill rate 5.6 GTexel / s 14.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 58 Watt
Transistor count 930 million 505 million
CUDA cores 48
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF + HDA
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 6.6" (16.8 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.1

Memory

Memory type System Shared GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 25.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 790 MHz

Technologies

CUDA