AMD Radeon R2 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
  • Around 15% better floating-point performance: 179.2 gflops vs 155.5 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1282 vs 1148
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1912 vs 1364
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1282 vs 1148
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1912 vs 1364
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 February 2015 vs 2 April 2012
Pipelines 128 vs 48
Floating-point performance 179.2 gflops vs 155.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1282 vs 1148
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1912 vs 1364
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1282 vs 1148
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1912 vs 1364

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM

  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 700 MHz
  • Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 6.48 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 637 vs 375
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 637 vs 375
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 810 MHz vs 700 MHz
Texture fill rate 6.48 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.756 vs 2.751
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 637 vs 375
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 637 vs 375

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.751
2.756
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
375
637
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1282
1148
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1912
1364
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
375
637
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1282
1148
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1912
1364
Name AMD Radeon R2 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 245
PassMark - G2D Mark 68
Geekbench - OpenCL 7324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.751 2.756
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 93.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.263 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 6.299
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 16.121
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 375 637
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1282 1148
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1912 1364
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 375 637
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1282 1148
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1912 1364

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R2 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name Beema GF119
Launch date 27 February 2015 2 April 2012
Place in performance rating 1587 1590
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 700 MHz 810 MHz
Floating-point performance 179.2 gflops 155.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 128 48
Texture fill rate 5.6 GTexel / s 6.48 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt
Transistor count 930 million 292 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Memory type System Shared DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 14.37 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1796 MHz