AMD Radeon R2 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 179.2 gflops vs 155.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1282 vs 1148
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1912 vs 1364
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1282 vs 1148
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1912 vs 1364
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 February 2015 vs 2 April 2012 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 179.2 gflops vs 155.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1282 vs 1148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 vs 1364 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1282 vs 1148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 vs 1364 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 6.48 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 637 vs 375
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 637 vs 375
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6.48 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.756 vs 2.751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 637 vs 375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 637 vs 375 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 249 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 68 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.751 | 2.756 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 93.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.263 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.299 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.121 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 375 | 637 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1282 | 1148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 | 1364 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 375 | 637 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1282 | 1148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 | 1364 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Beema | GF119 |
Launch date | 27 February 2015 | 2 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1593 | 1596 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 179.2 gflops | 155.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s | 6.48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 930 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.37 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz |