AMD Radeon R3 Graphics vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R3 Graphics and NVIDIA Quadro 400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
- Around 42% better floating-point performance: 153.6 gflops vs 108 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 32 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 307 vs 148
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 59
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1745 vs 1103
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1745 vs 1103
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 vs 5 April 2011 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 153.6 gflops vs 108 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 32 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 307 vs 148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 vs 59 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1745 vs 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1745 vs 1103 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 400
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 267 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 7.2 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4630 vs 1480
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 267 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4630 vs 1480 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | NVIDIA Quadro 400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 307 | 148 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 | 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1480 | 4630 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.343 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 106.771 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.35 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.234 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.88 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 587 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 750 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1745 | 1103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 587 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 750 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1745 | 1103 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | NVIDIA Quadro 400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Beema | GT216 |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 | 5 April 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1605 | 1607 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Price now | $145.55 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 267 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 153.6 gflops | 108 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | 7.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 32 Watt |
Transistor count | 930 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 163 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.32 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1540 MHz |