AMD Radeon R3 Graphics vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R3 Graphics and NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 4x more pipelines: 128 vs 32
- Around 92% better floating-point performance: 153.6 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 308 vs 221
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 37
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1745 vs 1640
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1745 vs 1640
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 vs 14 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 128 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 153.6 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 308 vs 221 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 vs 37 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1745 vs 1640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1745 vs 1640 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 267 MHz
- Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 267 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 308 | 221 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 | 37 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1482 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.343 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 106.771 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.35 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.234 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.88 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 587 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 750 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1745 | 1640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 587 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 750 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1745 | 1640 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Beema | G96 |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 | 14 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1604 | 1601 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $527 | |
Price now | $527 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.73 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 267 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 153.6 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 4.8 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 930 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 8.0 |