AMD Radeon R4 Graphics vs NVIDIA NVS 4200M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R4 Graphics and NVIDIA NVS 4200M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 2.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 48
• Around 32% better floating-point performance: 204.8 gflops vs 155.52 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 334 vs 277
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 99 vs 78
• 7.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 1155
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.721 vs 2.559
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 107.613 vs 103.797
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.612 vs 6.826
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.097 vs 12.836
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 701 vs 412
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1338 vs 688
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1811 vs 1726
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 701 vs 412
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1338 vs 688
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1811 vs 1726

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 4200M

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 6.48 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 4200M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	334 277
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	99 78
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8386 1155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.721 2.559
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	107.613 103.797
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.612 6.826
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.097 12.836
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	701 412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1338 688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1811 1726
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	701 412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1338 688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1811 1726

Compare specifications (specs)