AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 80 vs 16
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 104.0 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2761 vs 538
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 14 May 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 80 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops vs 33.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2761 vs 538 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 110
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 148
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 337
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 337
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 583
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 583
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1094
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1094
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 vs 110 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 vs 148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 vs 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 vs 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 vs 1094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 vs 1094 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 110 | 194 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 | 347 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2761 | 538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 337 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 337 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 583 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 583 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1094 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1094 | 2392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | Cedar | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 14 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1592 | 1501 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 1,200 million |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8.528 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1066 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |