AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
  • 5x more pipelines: 80 vs 16
  • 3.1x better floating-point performance: 104.0 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
  • 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2761 vs 538
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 December 2013 vs 14 May 2012
Texture fill rate 5.2 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 80 vs 16
Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 2761 vs 538

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 110
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 347 vs 148
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 337
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 337
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 583
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 583
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1094
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1094
Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 194 vs 110
PassMark - G3D Mark 347 vs 148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 754 vs 337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 754 vs 337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1492 vs 583
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1492 vs 583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2392 vs 1094
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2392 vs 1094

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
110
194
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
148
347
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2761
538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
337
754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
337
754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
583
1492
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
583
1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1094
2392
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1094
2392
Name AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G2D Mark 110 194
PassMark - G3D Mark 148 347
Geekbench - OpenCL 2761 538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 337 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 337 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 583 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 583 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1094 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1094 2392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 12.009
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM Intel HD Graphics 4000

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Generation 7.0
Code name Cedar Ivy Bridge GT2
Launch date 21 December 2013 14 May 2012
Place in performance rating 1592 1501
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 650 MHz 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 104.0 gflops 33.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 22 nm
Pipelines 80 16
Texture fill rate 5.2 GTexel / s 4.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 292 million 1,200 million
Boost clock speed 1050 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.0

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 8.528 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1066 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync