AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 266.8x more memory clock speed: 1334 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 64 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 6.8x more texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1681
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1681
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 3290
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 3290
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
| Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 1681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 1681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 3290 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1681 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1681 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3332 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Caicos | GK106 |
| Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 27 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1127 | 1003 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $144.81 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Transistor count | 370 million | 2,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 5.70" (14.5 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon E6760
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
IntelHD Graphics 6000
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R5 310 OEM
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465
