AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7560D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 320 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 545 vs 458
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 163
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4947 vs 1395
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1119 vs 593
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1284 vs 1076
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2264 vs 1990
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 vs 593
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1284 vs 1076
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2264 vs 1990
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 vs 26 September 2012 |
Pipelines | 320 vs 256 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 545 vs 458 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 vs 163 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4947 vs 1395 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1119 vs 593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1284 vs 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2264 vs 1990 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1119 vs 593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1284 vs 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2264 vs 1990 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7560D
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 730 MHz
Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7560D
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7560D |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 545 | 458 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 163 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4947 | 1395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.569 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.009 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.668 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.819 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1119 | 593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1284 | 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2264 | 1990 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1119 | 593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1284 | 1076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2264 | 1990 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7560D | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Terascale 3 |
Code name | Oland | Trinity |
Launch date | 1 November 2013 | 26 September 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1414 | 1416 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 760 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 256 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 |