AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• 2.1x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 3.4x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• 16x more pipelines: 320 vs 20
• 10.9x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 46 gflops
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 540 vs 521
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5166 vs 2181
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 7.844
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.886 vs 154.696
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.009 vs 0.958
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 9.084
• 9.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 8.335
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1119 vs 817
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 vs 817

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 278 vs 192
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 1284
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 2264
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 1284
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 2264

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	540 521
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	192 278
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5166 2181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.569 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.886 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.009 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.668 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.819 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 3044

Compare specifications (specs)