AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • 2.1x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • 3.4x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
  • 16x more pipelines: 320 vs 20
  • 10.9x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 46 gflops
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 544 vs 522
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4922 vs 2143
  • Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 7.844
  • Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.886 vs 154.696
  • Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.009 vs 0.958
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 9.084
  • 9.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 8.335
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1119 vs 817
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 vs 817
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 November 2013 vs 3 September 2013
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 350 MHz
Texture fill rate 15.6 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 320 vs 20
Floating-point performance 499.2 gflops vs 46 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 544 vs 522
Geekbench - OpenCL 4922 vs 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 13.569 vs 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 162.886 vs 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.009 vs 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.668 vs 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 77.819 vs 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1119 vs 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1119 vs 817

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

  • Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 193
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 1284
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 2264
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 1284
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 2264
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 22 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 277 vs 193
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1381 vs 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3044 vs 2264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1381 vs 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3044 vs 2264

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
544
522
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
193
277
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4922
2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13.569
7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
162.886
154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.009
0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.668
9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
77.819
8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1119
817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1284
1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2264
3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1119
817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1284
1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2264
3044
Name AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM Intel HD Graphics 4400
PassMark - G3D Mark 544 522
PassMark - G2D Mark 193 277
Geekbench - OpenCL 4922 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 13.569 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 162.886 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.009 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.668 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 77.819 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1119 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1284 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2264 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1119 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1284 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2264 3044
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 152

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM Intel HD Graphics 4400

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Generation 7.5
Code name Oland Haswell GT2
Launch date 1 November 2013 3 September 2013
Place in performance rating 1416 1417
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 780 MHz 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 730 MHz 350 MHz
Floating-point performance 499.2 gflops 46 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 22 nm
Pipelines 320 20
Texture fill rate 15.6 GTexel / s 4.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 20 Watt
Transistor count 1,040 million 392 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 1.0 x16
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 1

Technologies

Quick Sync