Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • 1615.4x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 10x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 733 vs 544
  • Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.422 vs 13.569
  • Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 221.42 vs 162.886
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.277 vs 1.009
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1256 vs 1119
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1720 vs 1284
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1256 vs 1119
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1720 vs 1284
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 November 2018 vs 1 November 2013
Boost clock speed 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 733 vs 544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.422 vs 13.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 221.42 vs 162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.277 vs 1.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1256 vs 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1720 vs 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1256 vs 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1720 vs 1284

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
  • Around 24% better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 182
  • Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4922 vs 3217
  • Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 12.269
  • 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 18.909
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2264 vs 1772
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2264 vs 1772
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 24
Floating-point performance 499.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 193 vs 182
Geekbench - OpenCL 4922 vs 3217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.668 vs 12.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 77.819 vs 18.909
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2264 vs 1772
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2264 vs 1772

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
733
544
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
182
193
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3217
4922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18.422
13.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
221.42
162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.277
1.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12.269
19.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18.909
77.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1256
1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1720
1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1772
2264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1256
1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1720
1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1772
2264
Name Intel UHD Graphics 615 AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 733 544
PassMark - G2D Mark 182 193
Geekbench - OpenCL 3217 4922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.422 13.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 221.42 162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.277 1.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.269 19.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 18.909 77.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1256 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1720 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1772 2264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1256 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1720 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1772 2264

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 615 AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 1.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT2 Oland
Launch date 7 November 2018 1 November 2013
Place in performance rating 1413 1416
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz 780 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 730 MHz
Floating-point performance 403.2 gflops 499.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 100.8 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 806.4 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 403.2 GFLOPS
Pipelines 24 320
Pixel fill rate 3.150 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel/s 15.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,040 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 DDR3
Shared memory Yes
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync