Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz
• 1615.4x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 10x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 734 vs 544
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.422 vs 13.569
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 221.42 vs 162.886
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.277 vs 1.009
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1256 vs 1119
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1720 vs 1284
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1256 vs 1119
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1720 vs 1284

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
• Around 24% better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 182
• Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4947 vs 3220
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 12.269
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 18.909
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2264 vs 1772
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2264 vs 1772

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	734 544
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	182 193
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3220 4947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.422 13.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	221.42 162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.277 1.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.269 19.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.909 77.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 2264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 2264

Compare specifications (specs)