AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics P4600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and Intel HD Graphics P4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 2.1x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 68% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 84 Watt
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 548 vs 506
• Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4936 vs 3376
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 8.915
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.886 vs 146.479
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 10.689
• 11.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 6.64

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600

• Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 780 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 491 vs 194
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.178 vs 1.009
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 vs 1284
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 2264
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 vs 1284
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 2264

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	548 506
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 491
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4936 3376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.569 8.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.886 146.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.009 1.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.668 10.689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.819 6.64
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 3345
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 3345

Compare specifications (specs)