AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 610 MHz
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 384 vs 240
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 189 Watt
• 2.9x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 80
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3319
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3319

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 48.8 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
• Around 4% better floating-point performance: 622.1 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1210 vs 935
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18229 vs 5635

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	338 80
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	935 1210
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5635 18229
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3319
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3319

Compare specifications (specs)