AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

NVIDIA Quadro K620

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
2.6x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3329
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3329

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 22 July 2014
Texture fill rate	18.72 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 730 MHz
Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 780 MHz
Around 44% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
Around 59% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 338
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 935
Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 5635
Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1935
Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1935
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 2380
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 2380

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 730 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz vs 780 MHz
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	480 vs 338
PassMark - G3D Mark	2220 vs 935
Geekbench - OpenCL	6869 vs 5635
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2970 vs 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2970 vs 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2490 vs 2380
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2490 vs 2380

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

338

480

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

935

2220

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5635

6869

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1935

2970

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1935

2970

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2380

2490

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2380

2490

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3329

Name	AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G2D Mark	338	480
PassMark - G3D Mark	935	2220
Geekbench - OpenCL	5635	6869
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1935	2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1935	2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2380	2490
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2380	2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	3329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		99.125
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		702

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM	NVIDIA Quadro K620
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Oland	GM107
Launch date	5 May 2015	22 July 2014
Place in performance rating	892	953
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$189.89
Price now		$189.93
Value for money (0-100)		15.23
Technical info
Boost clock speed	780 MHz	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	730 MHz	1058 MHz
Floating-point performance	599.0 gflops	863.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	384
Texture fill rate	18.72 GTexel / s	17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	41 Watt
Transistor count	1,040 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		160 mm
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	73.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management