AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 9.3x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
  • 42.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 6
  • 24.9x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 470
  • 120.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 8
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 31 May 2016 vs 5 January 2015
Texture fill rate 12.13 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
Pipelines 256 vs 6
Floating-point performance 388.1 gflops vs 15.6 gflops
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 966 vs 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 966 vs 8

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics

  • Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 850 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 15 Watt
  • Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 2981
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
Boost clock speed 850 MHz vs 800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 6 Watt vs 15 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5315 vs 2981

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2981
5315
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
966
470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
966
8
Name AMD Radeon R5 Graphics Intel HD Graphics
Geekbench - OpenCL 2981 5315
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 119.568
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 42.459
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 966 470
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1363
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 966 8
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1363
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1915
PassMark - G3D Mark 464
PassMark - G2D Mark 193

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 Graphics Intel HD Graphics

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Generation 8.0
Code name Wani Broadwell GT1
Launch date 31 May 2016 5 January 2015
Place in performance rating 1551 1384
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz 850 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 300 MHz
Floating-point performance 388.1 gflops 15.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 256 6
Texture fill rate 12.13 GTexel / s 1.3 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt
Transistor count 2,410 million 1,300 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x1

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Memory type System Shared System Shared