AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

NVIDIA GeForce 210

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
2.9x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
16x more pipelines: 256 vs 16
9.9x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2985 vs 2438
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 497
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 688
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 497
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 688

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	31 May 2016 vs 12 October 2009
Texture fill rate	12.13 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
Pipelines	256 vs 16
Floating-point performance	388.1 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	2985 vs 2438
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1363 vs 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1915 vs 688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1363 vs 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1915 vs 688

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210

7x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 200 MHz

Core clock speed	1402 MHz vs 200 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2985

2438

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1363

497

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1915

688

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1363

497

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1915

688

Name	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	NVIDIA GeForce 210
Geekbench - OpenCL	2985	2438
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	119.568
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	42.459
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1363	497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1915	688
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1363	497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1915	688
PassMark - G3D Mark		118
PassMark - G2D Mark		31

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	NVIDIA GeForce 210
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Wani	GT218
Launch date	31 May 2016	12 October 2009
Place in performance rating	1560	1661
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$29.49
Price now		$32.99
Value for money (0-100)		6.81
Technical info
Boost clock speed	800 MHz
Core clock speed	200 MHz	1402 MHz
Floating-point performance	388.1 gflops	39.36 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	256	16
Texture fill rate	12.13 GTexel / s	4.16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	30.5 Watt
Transistor count	2,410 million	260 million
CUDA cores		16
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
Height		2.731" (6.9 cm)
Length		6.60" (16.8 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.1
Memory
Memory type	System Shared	GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount		512 MB
Memory bandwidth		8.0 GB / s
Memory bus width		64 Bit
Memory clock speed		500 MHz
Technologies
CUDA