AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher boost clock speed: 800 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 6.7x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 64x more pipelines: 256 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 240
- 8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 240
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 1 February 2006 |
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 vs 240 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 vs 240 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 200 MHz
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2973 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 240 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 240 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 66 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 112 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Curie |
Code name | Wani | G72 |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 1 February 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1561 | 1559 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 450 MHz |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,410 million | 112 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | 64 / 32 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 3.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 450 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |