AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 410M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 2.6x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
  • 5.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 48
  • 3.5x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2973 vs 1032
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.166 vs 2.846
  • Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 vs 86.519
  • 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 vs 7.048
  • Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 494
  • Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 1163
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 1570
  • Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 494
  • Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 1163
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 1570
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 31 May 2016 vs 5 January 2011
Texture fill rate 12.13 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 256 vs 48
Floating-point performance 388.1 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 2973 vs 1032
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.166 vs 2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 119.568 vs 86.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 42.459 vs 7.048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 966 vs 494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1363 vs 1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1915 vs 1570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 966 vs 494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1363 vs 1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1915 vs 1570

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 410M

  • 5.8x more core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 15 Watt
Core clock speed 1150 MHz vs 200 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 12 Watt vs 15 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 410M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2973
1032
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.166
2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
119.568
86.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
42.459
7.048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
966
494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1363
1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1915
1570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
966
494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1363
1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1915
1570
Name AMD Radeon R5 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 410M
Geekbench - OpenCL 2973 1032
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.166 2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 119.568 86.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 42.459 7.048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 966 494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1363 1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1915 1570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 966 494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1363 1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1915 1570
PassMark - G3D Mark 256
PassMark - G2D Mark 127

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 410M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name Wani GF119
Launch date 31 May 2016 5 January 2011
Place in performance rating 1561 1563
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 1150 MHz
Floating-point performance 388.1 gflops 110.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 256 48
Texture fill rate 12.13 GTexel / s 4.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 12 Watt
Transistor count 2,410 million 292 million
CUDA cores 48
Gigaflops 73

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCI-E 2.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 1

Memory

Memory type System Shared DDR3
Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
Power management 8.0