AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 410M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

NVIDIA GeForce 410M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
2.6x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
5.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 48
3.5x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2899 vs 1027
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.166 vs 2.846
Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 vs 86.519
6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 vs 7.048
Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 494
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 1163
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 1570
Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 494
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 1163
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 1570

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	31 May 2016 vs 5 January 2011
Texture fill rate	12.13 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	256 vs 48
Floating-point performance	388.1 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	2899 vs 1027
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.166 vs 2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	119.568 vs 86.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	42.459 vs 7.048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	966 vs 494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1363 vs 1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1915 vs 1570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	966 vs 494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1363 vs 1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1915 vs 1570

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 410M

5.8x more core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 200 MHz
Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 15 Watt

Core clock speed	1150 MHz vs 200 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	12 Watt vs 15 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 410M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2899

1027

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.166

2.846

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

119.568

86.519

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42.459

7.048

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

966

494

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1363

1163

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1915

1570

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

966

494

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1363

1163

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1915

1570

Name	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	NVIDIA GeForce 410M
Geekbench - OpenCL	2899	1027
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.166	2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	119.568	86.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	42.459	7.048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	966	494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1363	1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1915	1570
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	966	494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1363	1163
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1915	1570
PassMark - G3D Mark		257
PassMark - G2D Mark		127

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	NVIDIA GeForce 410M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Wani	GF119
Launch date	31 May 2016	5 January 2011
Place in performance rating	1555	1557
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	800 MHz
Core clock speed	200 MHz	1150 MHz
Floating-point performance	388.1 gflops	110.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	256	48
Texture fill rate	12.13 GTexel / s	4.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	12 Watt
Transistor count	2,410 million	292 million
CUDA cores		48
Gigaflops		73
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	1
Memory
Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Memory bandwidth		12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width		64 Bit
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
Power management		8.0