AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 410M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 48
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2973 vs 1032
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.166 vs 2.846
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 vs 86.519
- 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 vs 7.048
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 494
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 1163
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 1570
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 494
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 1163
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 1570
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 5 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops vs 110.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2973 vs 1032 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 vs 2.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 vs 86.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 vs 7.048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 vs 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 vs 1163 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 vs 1570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 vs 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 vs 1163 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 vs 1570 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 410M
- 5.8x more core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 15 Watt
Core clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 410M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 410M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2973 | 1032 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 | 2.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 86.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 7.048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 1163 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 1570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 1163 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 1570 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 256 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 127 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 410M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Wani | GF119 |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1561 | 1563 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops | 110.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s | 4.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,410 million | 292 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Power management | 8.0 |