AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 2.1x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 5.9 billion / sec
  • 5.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 48
  • 3x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2973 vs 1333
  • Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.166 vs 3.237
  • Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 vs 83.376
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 vs 0.26
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 vs 5.92
  • 8.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 vs 4.992
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 536
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 536
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 31 May 2016 vs 5 January 2011
Texture fill rate 12.13 GTexel / s vs 5.9 billion / sec
Pipelines 256 vs 48
Floating-point performance 388.1 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 2973 vs 1333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.166 vs 3.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 119.568 vs 83.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.543 vs 0.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.649 vs 5.92
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 42.459 vs 4.992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 966 vs 536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 966 vs 536

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

  • 3.4x more core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 15 Watt
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 vs 1363
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2380 vs 1915
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 vs 1363
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2380 vs 1915
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 672 MHz vs 200 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 12 Watt vs 15 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1731 vs 1363
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2380 vs 1915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1731 vs 1363
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2380 vs 1915

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2973
1333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.166
3.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
119.568
83.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.543
0.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12.649
5.92
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
42.459
4.992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
966
536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1363
1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1915
2380
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
966
536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1363
1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1915
2380
Name AMD Radeon R5 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Geekbench - OpenCL 2973 1333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.166 3.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 119.568 83.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.543 0.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.649 5.92
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 42.459 4.992
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 966 536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1363 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1915 2380
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 966 536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1363 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1915 2380
PassMark - G3D Mark 286
PassMark - G2D Mark 74

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Fermi
Code name Wani GF108
Launch date 31 May 2016 5 January 2011
Place in performance rating 1561 1564
Type Desktop Laptop
Launch price (MSRP) $59.99
Price now $59.99
Value for money (0-100) 7.54

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 672 MHz
Floating-point performance 388.1 gflops 129.02 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 256 48
Texture fill rate 12.13 GTexel / s 5.9 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 12 Watt
Transistor count 2,410 million 585 million
CUDA cores 48

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Memory type System Shared DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 800 MHz
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
DirectCompute
Optimus
Verde Drivers