AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 5.9 billion / sec
- 5.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 48
- 3x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2973 vs 1333
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.166 vs 3.237
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 vs 83.376
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 vs 0.26
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 vs 5.92
- 8.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 vs 4.992
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 536
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 536
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 5 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s vs 5.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 256 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops vs 129.02 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2973 vs 1333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 vs 3.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 vs 83.376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 vs 0.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 vs 5.92 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 vs 4.992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 vs 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 vs 536 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 vs 1363
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2380 vs 1915
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 vs 1363
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2380 vs 1915
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 672 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 vs 1363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 vs 1915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 vs 1363 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 vs 1915 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2973 | 1333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 | 3.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 83.376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 0.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 5.92 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 4.992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 2380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 2380 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 286 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 74 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Wani | GF108 |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1561 | 1564 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.54 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 672 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops | 129.02 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s | 5.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,410 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |