AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • 3.4x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 3.55 GTexel / s
  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 256 vs 160
  • 2.7x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 142.08 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2963 vs 587
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 415
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 646
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 1468
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 415
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 646
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 1468
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 31 May 2016 vs 20 June 2011
Texture fill rate 12.13 GTexel / s vs 3.55 GTexel / s
Pipelines 256 vs 160
Floating-point performance 388.1 gflops vs 142.08 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 2963 vs 587
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 966 vs 415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1363 vs 646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1915 vs 1468
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 966 vs 415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1363 vs 646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1915 vs 1468

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP

  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 444 MHz vs 200 MHz
Core clock speed 444 MHz vs 200 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2963
587
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
966
415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1363
646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1915
1468
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
966
415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1363
646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1915
1468
Name AMD Radeon R5 Graphics AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
Geekbench - OpenCL 2963 587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.166
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 119.568
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 42.459
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 966 415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1363 646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1915 1468
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 966 415
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1363 646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1915 1468
PassMark - G3D Mark 237
PassMark - G2D Mark 117

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 Graphics AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Wani WinterPark
Launch date 31 May 2016 20 June 2011
Place in performance rating 1561 1562
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 800 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 444 MHz
Floating-point performance 388.1 gflops 142.08 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 256 160
Texture fill rate 12.13 GTexel / s 3.55 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 2,410 million 1,180 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP IGP

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Memory type System Shared System Shared