AMD Radeon R5 Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 12.13 GTexel / s vs 3.55 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 256 vs 160
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 388.1 gflops vs 142.08 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2963 vs 587
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 415
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 646
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 vs 1468
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 415
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 646
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 vs 1468
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 20 June 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s vs 3.55 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops vs 142.08 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2963 vs 587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 vs 415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 vs 646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 vs 1468 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 vs 415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 vs 646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 vs 1468 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 444 MHz vs 200 MHz
Core clock speed | 444 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2963 | 587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 1468 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 1468 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 237 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Wani | WinterPark |
Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 20 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1561 | 1562 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 444 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops | 142.08 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 12.13 GTexel / s | 3.55 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,410 million | 1,180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |