AMD Radeon R6 M255DX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R6 M255DX and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17123 vs 3802
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3563 vs 1913
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3563 vs 1913
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2014 vs 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 576 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17123 vs 3802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3563 vs 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3563 vs 1913 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 855 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 vs 1055
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 vs 1055
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3299 vs 1927
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3299 vs 1927
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 239 vs 116
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1202 vs 605
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 vs 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 vs 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3299 vs 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3299 vs 1927 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 vs 116 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1202 vs 605 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R6 M255DX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17123 | 3802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1055 | 2283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1055 | 2283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 | 3299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 | 3299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3563 | 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3563 | 1913 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 116 | 239 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | 1202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.824 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.111 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R6 M255DX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Jet | GK107 |
| Launch date | 7 January 2014 | 22 March 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1186 | 1188 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 576 | 384 |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R6 M255DX with others
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3400
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
AMDFirePro W2100
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940M
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
AMDRadeon R8 M350DX
