AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon HD 6510
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon HD 6510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1970
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2551
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1970
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 14 May 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 vs 1970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 vs 1970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6510
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 480 vs 320
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 39 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 16% higher memory clock speed: 1334 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7845 vs 5095
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 499.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7845 vs 5095 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6510
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 240 | AMD Radeon HD 6510 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 903 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 272 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5095 | 7845 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 | 1970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 2551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 | 1970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 2551 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 240 | AMD Radeon HD 6510 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Oland | Turks |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 14 May 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1254 | 1245 |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 480 |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 39 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 716 million |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 165 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | N / A | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 16 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1334 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 240 with others
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GTX
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7620G IGP
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000M
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon R7 240 vs
AMDRadeon 620
