AMD Radeon R9 M375 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375 and AMD Radeon R7 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R9 M375

AMD Radeon R7 240

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1015 MHz vs 780 MHz
2.6x more texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
2.6x better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 973 vs 896
Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10235 vs 5292
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.048 vs 13.344
Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.024 vs 1.262
Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.994 vs 21.59
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 142.872 vs 60.326
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2227 vs 1688
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2227 vs 1688

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 8 October 2013
Boost clock speed	1015 MHz vs 780 MHz
Texture fill rate	40.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 320
Floating-point performance	1,299 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	973 vs 896
Geekbench - OpenCL	10235 vs 5292
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	29.048 vs 13.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.024 vs 1.262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	35.994 vs 21.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	142.872 vs 60.326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2227 vs 1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2227 vs 1688

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 271 vs 161
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 290.632 vs 272.547
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1850
Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2112
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1850
Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2112

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	271 vs 161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	290.632 vs 272.547
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2342 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 2112
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2342 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 2112

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

973

896

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

161

271

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10235

5292

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

29.048

13.344

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

272.547

290.632

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.024

1.262

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

35.994

21.59

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

142.872

60.326

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2227

1688

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1850

2342

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2112

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2227

1688

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1850

2342

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2112

3353

Name	AMD Radeon R9 M375	AMD Radeon R7 240
PassMark - G3D Mark	973	896
PassMark - G2D Mark	161	271
Geekbench - OpenCL	10235	5292
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	29.048	13.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	272.547	290.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.024	1.262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	35.994	21.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	142.872	60.326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2227	1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1850	2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2112	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2227	1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1850	2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2112	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 M375	AMD Radeon R7 240
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Tropo	Oland
Design	AMD Radeon R9 300 Series	AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Launch date	5 May 2015	8 October 2013
Place in performance rating	1244	1245
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$69
Price now		$49.99
Value for money (0-100)		24.92
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1015 MHz	780 MHz
Compute units	10
Core clock speed	1000 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,299 gflops	499.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	320
Texture fill rate	40.6 GTexel / s	15.6 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,500 million	1,040 million
Stream Processors		320
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		50 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Eyefinity
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		168 mm
Supplementary power connectors		N / A
API support
DirectX	12	12
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s	72 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1100 MHz	1150 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
DualGraphics
Enduro
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
CrossFire
DDMA audio