AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 22.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1058 vs 805
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 vs 7.266
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 vs 0.464
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 vs 71.832
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 vs 1366
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2385
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 vs 1366
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2385

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 716.8 gflops
• Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 66 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 3.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 330 vs 284
• Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11715 vs 7533

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1058 805
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	284 330
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7533 11715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.161 7.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.655 0.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	96.934 71.832
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2179 1366
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 2385
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2179 1366
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 2385
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3357

Compare specifications (specs)