AMD Radeon R7 250 vs ATI FirePro V4800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250 and ATI FirePro V4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 22.4 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 716.8 gflops vs 620.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7533 vs 1672
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 vs 5.886
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 vs 0.529
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 vs 14.184
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 vs 56.777
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 vs 1512
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2211
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3326
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 vs 1512
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2211
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3326
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 26 April 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 22.4 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 716.8 gflops vs 620.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7533 vs 1672 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 vs 5.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 vs 0.529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 vs 14.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 vs 56.777 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2179 vs 1512 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 vs 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2179 vs 1512 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 vs 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3326 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V4800
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 69 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1204 vs 1059
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 284
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 321.782 vs 304.279
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 400 vs 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1204 vs 1059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 vs 284 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 321.782 vs 304.279 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V4800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 250 | ATI FirePro V4800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1059 | 1204 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 284 | 456 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7533 | 1672 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.161 | 5.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 304.279 | 321.782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.655 | 0.529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.046 | 14.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.934 | 56.777 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2179 | 1512 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2179 | 1512 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3326 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 250 | ATI FirePro V4800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Oland | Redwood |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 26 April 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $89 | $189 |
Place in performance rating | 1107 | 1110 |
Price now | $78.34 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.62 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 716.8 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 400 |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 22.4 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 69 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 627 million |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |