AMD Radeon R7 250 vs ATI FirePro V4800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250 and ATI FirePro V4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 22.4 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
• Around 16% better floating-point performance: 716.8 gflops vs 620.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7734 vs 1670
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 vs 5.886
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 vs 0.529
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 vs 14.184
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 vs 56.777
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 vs 1512
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2211
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3326
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 vs 1512
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2211
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3326

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V4800

• Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 69 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 3.1x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1204 vs 1072
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 289
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 321.782 vs 304.279

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V4800

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1072 1204
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	289 456
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7734 1670
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.161 5.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	304.279 321.782
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.655 0.529
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.046 14.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	96.934 56.777
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2179 1512
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 2211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2179 1512
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 2211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3326

Compare specifications (specs)