AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 22.4 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 716.8 gflops vs 311.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1051 vs 681
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 283 vs 225
• 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7525 vs 2473
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 vs 6.498
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 304.279 vs 140.06
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 vs 0.502
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 vs 9.613
• 7.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 vs 12.49
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 vs 1151
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 1853
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2073
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 vs 1151
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 1853
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2073

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1150 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1051 681
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	283 225
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	7525 2473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.161 6.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	304.279 140.06
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.655 0.502
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.046 9.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	96.934 12.49
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2179 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 2073
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2179 1151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3170 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 2073

Compare specifications (specs)