AMD Radeon R7 250X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 250X and NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 38 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
- 9.3x better floating-point performance: 1,216 gflops vs 130.56 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 666 MHz
- 9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2269 vs 251
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 249
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 February 2014 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 38 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,216 gflops vs 130.56 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 666 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2269 vs 251 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 vs 249 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 80 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 250X | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2269 | 251 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 | 249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.963 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.987 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.963 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3916 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3916 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 250X | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde | GT216 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 13 February 2014 | 3 September 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 666 | 668 |
| Price now | $260.70 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.25 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,216 gflops | 130.56 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 38 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 486 million |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 210 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 10.66 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz | 666 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 250X with others
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150 + nForce 630i
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
