AMD Radeon R7 260 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 260 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 20x more texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 35.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2892 vs 81
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 559 vs 294
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 December 2013 vs 9 August 2004 |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2892 vs 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 vs 294 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 115 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 260
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 260 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2892 | 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 | 294 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.189 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 798.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.294 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 240.395 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 260 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Curie |
Code name | Bonaire | NV43 A2 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 17 December 2013 | 9 August 2004 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 563 | 560 |
Price now | $89.99 | $59.99 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.11 | 1.71 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 146 million |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 104 GB/s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |