NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs AMD Radeon R7 260
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and AMD Radeon R7 260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 115 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1625 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3315 vs 2892
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.134 vs 26.189
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 17 December 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1625 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3315 vs 2892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 vs 26.189 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260
- Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 38% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1,117 gflops
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 559 vs 542
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 240.395 vs 141.164
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 1,117 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 vs 542 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 240.395 vs 141.164 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3315 | 2892 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 | 559 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | 26.189 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | 240.395 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 798.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.294 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P600 | AMD Radeon R7 260 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Bonaire |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 17 December 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | $109 |
Place in performance rating | 556 | 559 |
Price now | $169.99 | $89.99 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | 44.11 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,080 million |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 104 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 1625 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |