AMD Radeon R7 260X vs ATI FireGL V5600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 260X and ATI FireGL V5600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 9.6x more texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
• 7.5x more pipelines: 896 vs 120
• 10.3x better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 192 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
• 9.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3195 vs 341
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 523 vs 445
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2204
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2204

Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V5600

• Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 115 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 260X
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V5600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3195 341
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	523 445
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2204
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2204

Compare specifications (specs)