AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 260X and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 5.2x more texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 11.81 GTexel / s
• 28x more pipelines: 896 vs 32
• 16.8x better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 117.5 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
• 19.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3195 vs 166
• 10.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 523 vs 51
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.088 vs 38.948
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1731
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1731

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 115 Watt
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 179.899 vs 43.745
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1813.265 vs 804.436
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.817 vs 3.673
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 757.451 vs 221.539
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3689 vs 3485
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3689 vs 3485

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 260X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3195 166
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	523 51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.745 179.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	804.436 1813.265
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.673 13.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.088 38.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	221.539 757.451
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3485 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3485 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1731

Compare specifications (specs)