NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition and AMD Radeon R7 260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 89.26 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 896
• Around 9% better floating-point performance: 2,142 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 115 Watt
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3699 vs 3195
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 557 vs 523
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 826.477 vs 804.436
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6030 vs 3845
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3657 vs 3485
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6030 vs 3845
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3657 vs 3485

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X

• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.745 vs 24.986
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.673 vs 2.362
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.088 vs 35.269
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 221.539 vs 55.394

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3699 3195
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	557 523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.986 43.745
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	826.477 804.436
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.362 3.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.269 64.088
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	55.394 221.539
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6030 3845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3657 3485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6030 3845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3657 3485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3347 3358

Compare specifications (specs)