AMD Radeon R7 370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 139.3x more memory clock speed: 975 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 18734
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1506.404 vs 792.44
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.267 vs 4.888
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.279 vs 35.338
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 359.237 vs 200.825
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3335
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3335
- 9.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1499 vs 162
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 22 January 2015 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 975 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 vs 18734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 vs 792.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 vs 4.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 vs 35.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 vs 200.825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 vs 162 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 72 billion / sec vs 62.4 GTexel / s
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 1,997 gflops
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 vs 4499
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 610
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 vs 72.514
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 vs 7102
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 vs 7102
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 72 billion / sec vs 62.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2,413 gflops vs 1,997 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6111 vs 4499 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 vs 610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 vs 72.514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 vs 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 vs 7102 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4499 | 6111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 610 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 | 18734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 | 73.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 | 792.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 | 4.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 | 35.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 | 200.825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7102 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7102 | 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 | 162 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Trinidad | GM206 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 22 January 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $199 |
Place in performance rating | 411 | 514 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.63 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,997 gflops | 2,413 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 62.4 GTexel / s | 72 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,940 million |
Core clock speed | 1127 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 152 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | 1x 6-pins |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
SLI options | 2x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 975 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |