AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 370 vs 256
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1090 vs 614
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5924 vs 1550
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3341 vs 2724
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3341 vs 2724
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 5 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 vs 256 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 vs 614 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5924 vs 1550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 vs 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 vs 2724 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 624 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 624 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 | 256 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 | 614 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5924 | 1550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.874 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.487 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.033 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 57.396 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1389 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1389 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Oland | Turks |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 5 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 699 | 1254 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 624 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |