AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 8 October 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 6.8x more texture fill rate: 128.0 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 384
- 6.8x better floating-point performance: 4,096 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 675 vs 370
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6138 vs 1090
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 vs 3341
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 vs 3341
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 vs 370 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6138 vs 1090 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 vs 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 vs 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 | 675 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 | 6138 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5924 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Oland | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 8 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 699 | 372 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 4,096 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 128.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 4,313 million |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 288 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 280 PCI
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
ATIRadeon X600 XT
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000M
