AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 24% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 62 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 370 vs 303
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1090 vs 947
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5924 vs 3879
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3341 vs 1682
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3341 vs 1682
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2668
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2668
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 24 December 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 62 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 vs 303 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 vs 947 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5924 vs 3879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 vs 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 vs 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 2668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 2668 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
| Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 | 303 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 | 947 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5924 | 3879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3341 | 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3341 | 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 2668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 2668 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.229 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 258.26 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.885 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.02 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1600 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1600 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Oland | GF106 |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 24 December 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 699 | 1287 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Price now | $87.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.65 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 20 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 178 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 41.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5900
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 280 PCI
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
ATIRadeon X600 XT
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti
AMDRadeon R7 430 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000M
