AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 17% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9694 vs 7955
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2809 vs 2097
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 3127
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2809 vs 2097
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 3127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops vs 806.4 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 vs 7955 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 vs 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 vs 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 vs 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 vs 3127 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 3358
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 | 7955 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 6862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 6862 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde | Oland |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 764 | 807 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 806.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
ATIMobility FireGL V3200
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3450
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
