AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 525 vs 246

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 47.04 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
• Around 59% better floating-point performance: 1,505 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3383 vs 1931
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10898 vs 9800
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 vs 24.788
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 vs 638.196
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.692 vs 2.619
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 vs 41.414
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.513 vs 112.347
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 vs 2809
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3666
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 vs 2809
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3666

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1931 3383
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	525 246
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9800 10898
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.788 54.294
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	638.196 795.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.619 3.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.414 51.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	112.347 174.513
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2809 5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2809 5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3666 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3358

Compare specifications (specs)