AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 61% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 574 MHz
  • Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3132 MHz
  • Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1923 vs 1306
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 526 vs 444
  • Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 vs 93.533
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 June 2016 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed 925 MHz vs 574 MHz
Pipelines 512 vs 448
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz vs 3132 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1923 vs 1306
PassMark - G2D Mark 526 vs 444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.788 vs 24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 112.347 vs 93.533

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

  • Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 32.1 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,027.7 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.512 vs 638.196
  • Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.125 vs 2.619
  • Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 41.414
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 32.1 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 1,027.7 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 917.512 vs 638.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.125 vs 2.619
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.227 vs 41.414

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1923
1306
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
526
444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
24.788
24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
638.196
917.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.619
3.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
41.414
44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
112.347
93.533
Name AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark 1923 1306
PassMark - G2D Mark 526 444
Geekbench - OpenCL 9752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.788 24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 638.196 917.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.619 3.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 41.414 44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 112.347 93.533
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi
Code name Cape Verde GF100
Launch date 30 June 2016 25 July 2011
Place in performance rating 786 789
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $5,489

Technical info

Core clock speed 925 MHz 574 MHz
Floating-point performance 947.2 gflops 1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 512 448
Texture fill rate 29.6 GTexel / s 32.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 1,500 million 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 248 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 72 GB / s 150.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz 3132 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5