AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 574 MHz
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3132 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1920 vs 1306
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 524 vs 444
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 vs 93.533
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 448 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 3132 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1920 vs 1306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 524 vs 444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 vs 24.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 vs 93.533 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 32.1 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,027.7 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.512 vs 638.196
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.125 vs 2.619
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 41.414
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops vs 947.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.512 vs 638.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.125 vs 2.619 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 vs 41.414 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1920 | 1306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 524 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9728 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 24.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 917.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | 3.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | 44.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | 93.533 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Cape Verde | GF100 |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 785 | 788 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,489 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 574 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 32.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 150.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |