AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 61% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 574 MHz
Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
3.5x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 225 Watt
Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3132 MHz
Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1931 vs 1306
Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 525 vs 444
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 vs 93.533

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 June 2016 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 574 MHz
Pipelines	512 vs 448
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz vs 3132 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1931 vs 1306
PassMark - G2D Mark	525 vs 444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	24.788 vs 24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	112.347 vs 93.533

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 32.1 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,027.7 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.512 vs 638.196
Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.125 vs 2.619
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 41.414

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	32.1 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,027.7 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	917.512 vs 638.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.125 vs 2.619
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.227 vs 41.414

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1931

1306

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

525

444

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

24.788

24.784

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

638.196

917.512

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.619

3.125

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

41.414

44.227

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

112.347

93.533

Name	AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM	NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark	1931	1306
PassMark - G2D Mark	525	444
Geekbench - OpenCL	9800
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	24.788	24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	638.196	917.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.619	3.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	41.414	44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	112.347	93.533
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM	NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Cape Verde	GF100
Launch date	30 June 2016	25 July 2011
Place in performance rating	785	788
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$5,489
Technical info
Core clock speed	925 MHz	574 MHz
Floating-point performance	947.2 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	512	448
Texture fill rate	29.6 GTexel / s	32.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	1,500 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length		248 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	72 GB / s	150.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5