AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 3.9x more texture fill rate: 16.46 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
• 15.7x better floating-point performance: 526.8 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• 42x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 538
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 vs 8.712
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 vs 155.638
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 vs 0.931
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 vs 7.36
• 7.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 vs 12.009
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 754
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 1492
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• 3.3x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 200 MHz
• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 758 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• 22.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 33.5
• 44x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 33.9
• 39.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 60

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22612 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.145 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	206.354 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.2 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.15 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	85.46 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1979 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2101 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.5 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.9 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60 2392

Compare specifications (specs)