AMD Radeon R7 M260 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 M260 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M260
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.249 versus 10.243
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.992 versus 18.793
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.895 versus 19.139
- 27.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 versus 51
- 23.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1093 versus 47
- 28.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1704 versus 59.6
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 June 2014 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 versus 10.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 versus 18.793 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 versus 19.139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 versus 51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 versus 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 versus 59.6 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1085 MHz versus 940 MHz
- Environ 54% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 34.72 GTexel / s versus 22.56 GTexel / s
- Environ 15% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 833.3 gflops versus 721.9 gflops
- 5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 393.811 versus 145.3
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.966 versus 0.925
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3011 versus 1404
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2916 versus 1093
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 versus 1704
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1085 MHz versus 940 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s versus 22.56 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 833.3 gflops versus 721.9 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.811 versus 145.3 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.966 versus 0.925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3011 versus 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2916 versus 1093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 1704 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 499 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5079 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 | 10.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 145.3 | 393.811 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.925 | 0.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 | 18.793 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 | 19.139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 3011 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1093 | 2916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 | 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 59.6 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 M260 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Topaz | GK107 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 11 June 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $799 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1487 | 1489 |
| Prix maintenant | $799 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.33 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 6 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 940 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 721.9 gflops | 833.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.56 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 1,270 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 32 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 M260 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4000
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7420G
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
IntelHD Graphics 5500
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
IntelHD Graphics 615
