AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD Radeon HD 7750

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M265 and AMD Radeon HD 7750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 825 MHz vs 800 MHz
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 vs 305
• 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 vs 305

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750

• Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 29% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 633.6 gflops
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1693 vs 536
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 427 vs 134
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 vs 12.031
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 vs 282.111
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 vs 1.455
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 vs 21.704
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 vs 68.392
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1439 vs 1264
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3295 vs 2424
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1439 vs 1264
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3295 vs 2424

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M265
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 1693
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	134 427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.031 21.658
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	282.111 566.052
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.455 2.182
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.704 37.143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	68.392 98.126
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1551 305
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1264 1439
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2424 3295
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1551 305
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1264 1439
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2424 3295

Compare specifications (specs)