AMD Radeon R7 M265 versus AMD Radeon HD 7750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 M265 and AMD Radeon HD 7750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M265
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 825 MHz versus 800 MHz
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- 5.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 versus 305
- 5.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 versus 305
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 20 May 2014 versus 15 February 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 825 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 versus 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 versus 305 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7750
- Environ 29% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.6 GTexel / s versus 19.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 29% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 819.2 gflops versus 633.6 gflops
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1125 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1693 versus 536
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 427 versus 134
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 versus 12.031
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 versus 282.111
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 versus 1.455
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 versus 21.704
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 versus 68.392
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1439 versus 1264
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3295 versus 2424
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1439 versus 1264
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3295 versus 2424
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s versus 19.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops versus 633.6 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1693 versus 536 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 versus 134 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 versus 12.031 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 versus 282.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 versus 1.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 versus 21.704 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 versus 68.392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1439 versus 1264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 versus 2424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1439 versus 1264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 versus 2424 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M265
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 M265 | AMD Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 536 | 1693 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 134 | 427 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5587 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.031 | 21.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 282.111 | 566.052 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.455 | 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.704 | 37.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.392 | 98.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1264 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2424 | 3295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1264 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2424 | 3295 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 M265 | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Topaz | Cape Verde |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 20 May 2014 | 15 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1404 | 1128 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.41 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 825 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 6 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 633.6 gflops | 819.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.8 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 1,500 million |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 32 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 M265 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
ATIRadeon IGP 340M
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550G
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
AMDRadeon R5 240 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710A
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
AMDRadeon R6 Graphics
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
