AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M265 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 200x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5587 vs 4493
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.455 vs 1.254
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.704 vs 18.386
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 68.392 vs 23.499

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 19.8 GTexel / s
• Around 28% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 633.6 gflops
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 536
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 134
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 vs 12.031
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 vs 282.111
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1551
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1264
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2424
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1551
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1264
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2424

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M265
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 1749
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	134 368
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5587 4493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.031 12.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	282.111 364.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.455 1.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.704 18.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	68.392 23.499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1551 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1264 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2424 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1551 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1264 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2424 3332

Compare specifications (specs)