AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M265 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 200x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
| Launch date | 20 May 2014 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 75% better floating-point performance: 1,111 gflops vs 633.6 gflops
- 6.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 536
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 134
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9306 vs 5587
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 vs 12.031
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 639.427 vs 282.111
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.341 vs 1.455
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 vs 21.704
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.814 vs 68.392
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 1551
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 1264
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2424
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 1551
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 1264
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2424
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 825 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops vs 633.6 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 vs 536 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 vs 134 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 vs 5587 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 vs 12.031 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 vs 282.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 vs 1.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 vs 21.704 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 vs 68.392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 vs 1551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 1264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 2424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 vs 1551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 1264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 2424 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M265
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M265 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 536 | 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 134 | 515 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5587 | 9306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.031 | 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 282.111 | 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.455 | 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.704 | 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.392 | 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1264 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2424 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 | 4498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1264 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2424 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M265 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Topaz | GM107 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 20 May 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1404 | 724 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | |
| Price now | $150.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 1,111 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M265 with others
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
ATIRadeon IGP 340M
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550G
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
AMDRadeon R5 240 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710A
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
AMDRadeon R6 Graphics
AMDRadeon R7 M265 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
