AMD Radeon R7 M270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M270 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M270
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 4% better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 612.1 gflops
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.826 vs 9.932
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 vs 1502
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 vs 1502
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 9 January 2014 vs 24 April 2012 |
| Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops vs 612.1 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.826 vs 9.932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 vs 1502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 vs 1502 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 25.5 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2167 vs 527
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 2081
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2167 vs 527
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 2081
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.5 GTexel / s vs 19.8 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 vs 527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 2081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 vs 527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 2081 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M270
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M270 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 767 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6810 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.826 | 9.932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | 1502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 527 | 2167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2081 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | 1502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 527 | 2167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2081 | 3334 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 254.345 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.14 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.32 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M270 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Opal | GK107 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 9 January 2014 | 24 April 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1384 | 1386 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 612.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | 25.5 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
| Memory type | Not Listed | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M270 with others
AMDRadeon R7 M270 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7200 GS
AMDRadeon R7 M270 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5570
AMDRadeon R7 M270 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 M270 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP
AMDRadeon R7 M270 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
AMDRadeon R7 M270 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
