AMD Radeon R7 M360 vs AMD FirePro S4000X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M360 and AMD FirePro S4000X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 7 August 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S4000X
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 31 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 992.0 gflops vs 864.0 gflops
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.089 vs 14.911
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 478.725 vs 141.079
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.08 vs 0.927
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.934 vs 14.763
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 92.567 vs 49.774
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops vs 864.0 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.089 vs 14.911 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 vs 141.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.08 vs 0.927 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.934 vs 14.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 vs 49.774 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S4000X
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | AMD FirePro S4000X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 573 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5211 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | 19.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 141.079 | 478.725 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 | 2.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 | 34.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 | 92.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M360 | AMD FirePro S4000X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Meso | Venus |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 7 August 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1438 | 1439 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 31 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,500 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M360 with others
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4670
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO 512
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M230
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
AMDFirePro S4000X
AMDRadeon R7 M360 vs
AppleA12Z Bionic
