AMD Radeon R7 M360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M360 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 3.5x more texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
  • 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
  • 3.5x better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 576 vs 536
  • 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4837 vs 2012
  • 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 4.25
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1384 vs 929
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1280 vs 1210
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2460 vs 1524
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1384 vs 929
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1280 vs 1210
  • Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2460 vs 1524
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 15 January 2011
Texture fill rate 27 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
Pipelines 384 vs 96
Floating-point performance 864.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 576 vs 536
Geekbench - OpenCL 4837 vs 2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.911 vs 4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1384 vs 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1280 vs 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2460 vs 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1384 vs 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1280 vs 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2460 vs 1524

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

  • Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 vs 149
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 176 vs 149

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
576
536
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
149
176
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4837
2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14.911
4.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1384
929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1280
1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2460
1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1384
929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1280
1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2460
1524
Name AMD Radeon R7 M360 NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark 576 536
PassMark - G2D Mark 149 176
Geekbench - OpenCL 4837 2012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.911 4.25
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 141.079
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 14.763
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 49.774
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1384 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1280 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2460 1524
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1384 929
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1280 1210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2460 1524

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 M360 NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Fermi
Code name Meso GF106
Design AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Launch date 5 May 2015 15 January 2011
Place in performance rating 1435 1432
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1125 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 1100 MHz 1300 MHz
Floating-point performance 864.0 gflops 249.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 96
Texture fill rate 27 GTexel / s 7.8 billion / sec
Transistor count 3,100 million 1,170 million
CUDA cores 96
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12 12 API with Feature Level 12.1
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed 1.1
OpenGL 4.4 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus