AMD Radeon R7 M360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M360 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 576 vs 536
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4837 vs 2012
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.911 vs 4.25
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1384 vs 929
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1280 vs 1210
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2460 vs 1524
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1384 vs 929
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1280 vs 1210
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2460 vs 1524
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 15 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s vs 7.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops vs 249.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 576 vs 536 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4837 vs 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 vs 4.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 vs 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 vs 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 vs 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 vs 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 vs 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 vs 1524 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 vs 149
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 vs 149 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M360
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 576 | 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4837 | 2012 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | 4.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 141.079 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.774 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1384 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1280 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2460 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1384 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1280 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2460 | 1524 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M360 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Meso | GF106 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 15 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1435 | 1432 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 249.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 7.8 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |