AMD Radeon R7 M445 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M445 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 18.4 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 15-25 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1802 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 943 vs 797
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 vs 148
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5345 vs 3885
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.765 vs 9.392
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 278.624 vs 157.479
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.268 vs 0.864
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.335 vs 16.101
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.067 vs 44.77
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 vs 1589
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 vs 1589
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 1 April 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1802 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 943 vs 797 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 vs 148 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5345 vs 3885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.765 vs 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 278.624 vs 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.268 vs 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.335 vs 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.067 vs 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 vs 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 vs 1589 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 920 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 28% better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 vs 2138
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 1853
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 vs 2138
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 1853
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz vs 920 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 588.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 vs 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 vs 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 1853 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M445
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M445 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 943 | 797 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 | 148 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5345 | 3885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.765 | 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 278.624 | 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.268 | 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.335 | 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.067 | 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2138 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1853 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2138 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1853 | 3339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M445 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Meso | GK107 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1309 | 1312 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 920 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1802 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |