AMD Radeon R7 M445 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 M445 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M445
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 18.4 GTexel / s versus 15.68 GTexel / s
- Environ 80% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15-25 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1802 MHz
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 944 versus 796
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 versus 148
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5345 versus 3882
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.765 versus 9.392
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 278.624 versus 157.479
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.268 versus 0.864
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.335 versus 16.101
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.067 versus 44.77
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 versus 1589
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 versus 1589
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2016 versus 1 April 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.4 GTexel / s versus 15.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1802 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 944 versus 796 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 versus 148 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5345 versus 3882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.765 versus 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 278.624 versus 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.268 versus 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.335 versus 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.067 versus 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 versus 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 versus 1589 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 780 MHz
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 980 MHz versus 920 MHz
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- Environ 28% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 752.6 gflops versus 588.8 gflops
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 versus 2138
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 versus 1853
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 versus 2138
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 versus 1853
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 780 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz versus 920 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops versus 588.8 gflops |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 versus 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 versus 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 versus 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 versus 1853 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M445
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 M445 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 944 | 796 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 | 148 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5345 | 3882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.765 | 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 278.624 | 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.268 | 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.335 | 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.067 | 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2138 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1853 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2138 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1853 | 3339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 M445 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Meso | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2016 | 1 April 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1309 | 1312 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 920 MHz | 980 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 780 MHz | 810 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 588.8 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.4 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 32 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 1802 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |