AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 2.5x more boost clock speed: 930 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 29.76 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- 25.6x more pipelines: 512 vs 20
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 388 vs 275
- 8.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1420 vs 171
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 18 April 2006 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 930 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 29.76 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 20 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 vs 275 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1420 vs 171 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | 275 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1420 | 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3112 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3112 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Curie |
Code name | Cape Verde | G71 |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 18 April 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 606 | 604 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 930 MHz | 375 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 375 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 29.76 GTexel / s | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 500 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 |