AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 375 MHz
  • 2.5x more boost clock speed: 930 MHz vs 375 MHz
  • 3.3x more texture fill rate: 29.76 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
  • 25.6x more pipelines: 512 vs 20
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
  • 4.6x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 394 vs 275
  • 8.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1457 vs 171
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 December 2013 vs 18 April 2006
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 375 MHz
Boost clock speed 930 MHz vs 375 MHz
Texture fill rate 29.76 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
Pipelines 512 vs 20
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 90 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 394 vs 275
PassMark - G3D Mark 1457 vs 171

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 65 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
394
275
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1457
171
Name AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
PassMark - G2D Mark 394 275
PassMark - G3D Mark 1457 171
Geekbench - OpenCL 40722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3112
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3168
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Curie
Code name Cape Verde G71
Launch date 21 December 2013 18 April 2006
Place in performance rating 599 593
Type Desktop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 930 MHz 375 MHz
Core clock speed 900 MHz 375 MHz
Floating-point performance 952.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 90 nm
Pipelines 512 20
Texture fill rate 29.76 GTexel / s 9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 1,500 million 278 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-II
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 9.0c
OpenGL 4.5 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 73.6 GB / s 32.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 500 Bit
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 256
Shared memory 0